[NEW] Highlight summaries of this report:
The Broadband Commission for Sustainable Development, co-founded by UNESCO and ITU, has launched a comprehensive new study on one of the world's most difficult challenges: ‘Balancing Act: Countering Digital Disinformation while respecting Freedom of Expression’. The study is unique in its global scale and comprehensiveness, but it is also highly action-oriented, with a suite of sector-specific actionable recommendations and a 23-point framework to test disinformation responses.
Targeted analyses and recommendations address the life cycle of online disinformation: from production to transmission, reception and reproduction. Readers will find chapter packages that are of special interest to:
- Legislators and policy makers (counter disinformation campaigns, electoral-specific responses, the Freedom of Expression Assessment Framework) [Ch5, Ch8, Executive Summary]
- Internet companies, producers and distributors (content curation, technical and algorithmic, advertisement policy, demonitisation responses) [Ch6, Executive Summary]
- Journalists, investigative researchers and fact checkers [Ch4, Ch3, Ch2, Executive Summary]
- Universities and applied and empirical researchers [Ch3, Executive Summary]
- Target audiences (educational, ethical and normative, empowerment and credibility labeling responses) [Ch7, Executive Summary]
The findings are organised into a typology of 11 different categories of responses to disinformation – ranging from identification and investigatory responses, through to policy and legislative measures, technological steps, and educational approaches. For each category of response, the reader will find a description of work being done around the world, by which actors, how it is funded and who or what is targeted. The report further analyses the underlying assumptions and theories of change behind these responses, while weighing up the challenges and opportunities. Each category of response is also assessed in terms of its intersections with the universal human right of freedom of expression, with a particular focus on press freedom and access to information. Finally, case studies of responses to COVID-19 disinformation are presented within each category.
At the heart of this knowledge product is the need to balance responses to disinformation with respect for freedom of expression. The research shows us that this can be done.
UNESCO and Dr. Hessa Al Jaber of Qatar co-chaired the Working Group of the Broadband Commission that commissioned this research. The research is published in the context of the Commission’s 10th Anniversary.
This research of the Broadband Commission study is edited by Professor Kalina Bontcheva (University of Sheffield, UK) and Dr Julie Posetti (International Center for Journalists,U.S.; Centre for Freedom of the Media, University of Sheffield/ Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford, UK). The other contributing authors are Denis Teyssou (Agence France Presse, France); Dr. Trisha Meyer (Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium); Sam Gregory (WITNESS, U.S.); Clara Hanot (EU Disinfo Lab, Belgium); and Dr. Diana Maynard (University of Sheffield, UK).
Download the Executive summary: (in English - Spanish - French)
Chapter 1 - Introduction
Chapter 2 - Typology of Disinformation Responses
Chapter 3 - Research Context and Gaps
Chapter 4 - Identification Responses
Chapter 5 - Ecosystem Responses aimed at Producers and Distributors
Chapter 6 - Responses within Production and Distribution
Chapter 7 - Responses aimed at the Target Audiences of Disinformation Campaigns
Chapter 8 - Challenges and Recommended Actions
- Infodemic: disinformation and media literacy in the context of COVID-19 (English - Portuguese)
Internet Sectoral Overview - Number 3, September 2021
- The Impact of Disinformation on Democratic Processes and Human Rights In The World
European Parliament - Directorate-General For External Policies