
UNESCO Global Geoparks (UGGp)
CaoBangUGGp.jpg

New Applications
The following 17 areas have applied in 2021-2022 to be designated UNESCO Global Geopark and have entered the official process of evaluation by UNESCO. In order to enable Member States to exercise their oversight responsibility (as set out in 5.4 Applications review of the Operational Guidelines for UNESCO Global Geoparks, the documents below provide a geological and geographic summary, including a detailed map indicating the location, of each applicant.
According to the Article 5.4 iv of “The Operational Guidelines of the International Geoscience and Geoparks Programme”, adopted by the 38th session of the General Conference of UNESCO, Member States that have concerns about one or more of these new applications have the possibility to send a written objection to the Secretariat until 7 July 2022, 12 pm CET, end of the 3 months grace period.
Brazil |
Quarta Colônia |
Caçapava |
|
China |
Kanbula |
Wugongshan |
|
Greece |
Nisyros |
Indonesia |
Merangin Jambi |
Rajah Ampat |
|
Iran |
Tabas |
Ireland |
Joyce Country and Western Lakes |
Italy |
Murge (MurGEopark) |
Kyrgyzstan |
Teskei |
Mexico |
Rutas del Agua |
Norway |
Sunnhordland |
Republic of Korea |
Busan |
Russian Federation |
Undoria |
Spain |
Cabo Ortegal |
Costa Quebrada |
2021-2022 UNESCO Global Geopark Area Modification Requests
The 4 following areas have expressed the wish to change the size of their existing UNESCO Global Geopark with less than 10%. In order to enable Member States to exercise their oversight responsibility (as set out in 5.6 Applications review of the Operational Guidelines for UNESCO Global Geoparks, the document below provides a geological and geographic summary, including a detailed map indicating the location, of each UNESCO Global Geopark wishing to change its size.
4 Area modifications < 10 %
China |
Ningde |
Shilin |
|
Finland |
Lauhanvuori Hämeenkangas |
Japan |
Toya-Usu |
2021-2022 UNESCO Global Geopark Area Modification Requests >10%
The following 2 areas have expressed the wish to change the size of their existing UNESCO Global Geopark with more than 10%. In order to enable Member States to exercise their oversight responsibility (as set out in 5.6 Applications review of the Operational Guidelines for UNESCO Global Geoparks, the document below provides a geological and geographic summary, including a detailed map indicating the location, of each UNESCO Global Geoparks wishing to change its size.
2 Area modifications > 10 %
Chile |
Kütralkura |
China |
Leye-Fengshan |
The document with all relevant information:
Disclaimer
The Secretariat of UNESCO does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement or other information or documentation provided by the States Parties to the Secretariat of UNESCO.
The publication of any such advice, opinion, statement or other information documentation on the website and/or on working documents also does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its boundaries.